The senior essay in Humanities is a substantial work of interdisciplinary scholarship addressing questions of general interest to humanists. Every successful essay addresses a topic that is intrinsically interdisciplinary and of interest to a wide audience, argues for its main claims in a manner credible to scholars of the relevant research fields, and showcases the student’s own care and determination along the way.
Thirty (30) double-spaced pages in a standard 12-point font is the minimum length for the main text excluding the bibliography, appendices, and other notes of unusual length. There is no maximum length.
The content of the senior essay must reflect the author’s original research and writing. The topic need not be original, and some familiarity with and attention to existing secondary literature is expected. It is vital, however, that a senior essay in the Humanities not be overwhelmed by a review of existing scholarship. At the heart of every essay, the author is expected to strike out on his/her own in a manner that is both well-motivated and well-organized.
A full bibliography must accompany each senior essay. It must include both all sources cited in the essay itself and all sources consulted, but not cited, that have had more than a trivial influence on the author’s argumentation. Proper citation is expected, using any of the standards in common use in Yale humanities departments (MLA; Chicago style; APA). It is up to the individual student and his or her advisor to decide which citation standard is most appropriate. Both footnotes and endnotes are permitted, at the advisor’s discretion.
Within the main text itself, each senior essay must contain all of the following internal components:
- a cogent main claim that is articulated prominently and concisely in the opening pages.
- an introduction that attracts the general reader’s attention effectively, first to the overall topic, and then to the author’s main claim.
- body paragraphs and/or sections that each make a single point well, so that the essay’s argument builds from one body paragraph and/or section to the next.
- signposts—references to where the argument has come from, and where it is headed— to mark transitions from one body paragraph and/or section to the next.
- a satisfying conclusion that both reprises the essay’s main claim and highlights the new, more informed perspective on the material that the essay has imparted to the reader.
While these internal components must all be present in the essay, they need not be explicitly marked. In general, it is up to the student and advisor to decide to what extent headings, subtitles, or other explicit marks of internal structure should be used in a particular essay.
The final version of the senior essay must be submitted to both your advisor and to DUS Paul Grimstad (cc Erin Townsend) as either a Word document or PDF, no later than noon on the due date.
Late submissions will be penalized with a lower grade on the essay. Students submitting late work will lose their eligibility for distinction in the Major.
Evaluation
Once you submit your senior essay, it is passed on for initial evaluation by both your advisor and a second reader selected by the DUS. The role of the second reader is to offer a dispassionate assessment of your essay based solely on its merits as a scholarly contribution to the humanities. In choosing a second reader, the DUS looks for an unbiased expert. This is a faculty member who (1) is knowledgeable about your topic, and (2) is not presumptively hostile to your methodology.
The evaluation process takes several weeks. Once your advisor and second reader have finished assessing your essay, both submit their recommendations to the DUS. The DUS then takes both sets of recommendations into account when assigning your essay its final grade and determining its eligibility for Yale College prizes. Be aware, therefore, that while your advisor and the second reader play important indirect roles in the grading of your senior essay, the DUS is the final arbiter.